咨询律师 找律师 案件委托   热门省份: 北京 浙江 上海 山东 广东 天津 重庆 江苏 湖南 湖北 四川 河南 河北 110法律咨询网 法律咨询 律师在线
当前位置: 首页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 > 国际贸易论文 >
论多边贸易体制下的绿色壁垒问题(7)
www.110.com 2010-07-26 11:31

注释:
[1]、以茶叶为例,欧盟宣布禁止使用的农药从旧标准的29种增加到了新标准的62种,部分农药标准比原标准提高了100倍以上;再比如蜂蜜,欧盟提出蜂蜜中的氯霉素不能超过0.1个ppb,也就是说10万吨里不能有1克氯霉素含量;2002年 1月,日本以我国蔬菜有2.8%抽检不合格为由,对我国农产品强化检查了一个月,过去只抽查6种农药,现在要查40多种。
[2]、80年代后期到90年代初,随着新一轮世界贸易自由化趋势的推动,关税之墙普遍变矮,但发达国家为实行贸易保护,积极推出非关税限制措施,实行“管理贸易”。“绿色壁垒”就是在这种背景下产生的。
[3]、 Article XX General Exceptions: “subject to the requirement that such measures are not applied in a manner which would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail, or a disguised restriction on international trade ,nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent the adoption or enforcement by any contracting party of measures:……(b)necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or health;……(g)relating to the conservation of exhaustible natural resources if such measures are made effective in conjunction with restrictions on domestic production or consumption;……”
[4]、参见: “EC-MEASURES CONCERNING MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS(Hormones)”
[5]、上诉机构裁定:“.......we find European Communities did not actually proceed to an assessment, within the meaning of Articles 5.1 and 5.2, of the risks arising from the failure of observance of good veterinary practice combined with problems of the use of hormones for growth promotion purposes……We affirm, therefore, the ultimate conclusion of the Panel that the EC import prohibition is not based on a risk assessment within the meaning of Articles 5.1 and 5.2 of the SPS Agreement and is, therefore, inconsistent with the requirements of Article 5.1”---- WT/DS26&48AB/RP

 

 

 

参考文献
1、黄东黎 《国际贸易法 经济理论 法律 案例 》,法律出版社 2003.8

发布免费法律咨询
广告服务 | 联系方式 | 人才招聘 | 友情链接网站地图
copyright©2006 - 2010 110.com inc. all rights reserved.
版权所有:110.com 京icp备06054339