证据

how do you know that ？

I have answered.

but I think your answer for my question was just your personal opinion ，right ？

how do you know that?

because you are a lawyer ，you have had no any experience of working as a judge .

yes ,but this doesnot effect my judgement on the problem.just as I know the flavor of the eggs,although I'm not a hen

just your judgement ，but it cannot be denied that any law question is so rigorous and your answer was just your own opinion； it was funny that to my surprise ，you clarified your private opinion by using an analogy which often happens in our daily life ！so I wanna ask you ： have you exeperienced a court trial where the judges used tropes to demonstrate their law point of view from the beginning to the end ？

ok,I think you can discuss with a judge on the issue

在什么情况下会影响呢？

与案件本身无直接关系的证据不会被采纳

我知道您的意思，但是一个人过往诚信问题会影响法官的心里，从而影响到他的“自由裁量权”的运用吗

！！！！！

这么多感叹号什么意思，您直接说就是了

已经和你说的很清楚了

您的回答是证据的关联性，我的问题是在证据不具有关联性的前提下啊，我知道与本案无关的证据法院不会采纳，但是我说的是法官运用自由裁量权时是否考虑当事人过往诚信问题？