论宪法效力的界定及其对私法的影响(上)(7)
www.110.com 2010-07-24 11:27
[xxii] Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, 407 U.S. 551.
[xxiii] State v. Hunt, 450 A.2d 952,同注[10],第467页。
[xxiv] Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center, 592 P.2d 341.
[xxv]同注[10],第474页。
[xxvi] State v. Schmid,423 A.2d 615.
[xxvii] Commonwealth v. Tate, 432 A.2d 1382.
[xxviii] Western Pennsylvanian Socialist Workers 1982 Campaign v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co., 515 A.2d 1331; 512 PA 23.
[xxix] Delvin, “Constructing Alternative to ‘State Action’ as a Limit on State Constitutional Rights Guarantees: Survey,Critique and Proposal”, Rutgers Law Journal 21: 819, 883-892.
北京大学法学院·张千帆
- 上一篇:试论中美宪法权利
- 下一篇:在现代性与民族性之间——现代中国的自由民族
最新文章
推荐文章