[13] Cynthia R. Farina, Statutory Interpretation and the Balance of Power in the Administrative State, 89 Colum. L. Rev. 452.

　　[14] Cooley R. Howarth, Jr., United States v. Mead Corp.： More Pieces for the Chevron/Skidmore Deference Puzzled, Admin. L. Rev., Vol.54, No.2, Spring 2002.

　　[15] See Cooley R. Howarth, Jr., United States v. Mead Corp.： More Pieces for the Chevron/Skidmore Deference Puzzle, Admin. L. Rev. Vol.54, No.2, Spring 2002.

　　[16] Richard W. Murphy, A “New” Counter- Marbury： Reconciling Skidmore Deference And Agency Interpretive Freedom, Admin. L. Rev. Vol. 56, No.1, Winter 2004.

　　[17] See Paul A. Dame, Note, Stare Decisis, Chevron, and Skidmore： Do Administrative Agencies Have the Power to Overrule Courts？, 44 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 405, 435-36（2002）。

　　[18] See Breyer, Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy, 38 Admin. L. Rev. 363（1986）。

　　[19] Russell L. Weaver, The Emperor Has No Clothes： Christensen, Mead and Dual Deference Standards, 54 Admin. L. Rev. 173（2002）。

　　[20]See Kenneth Culp Davis, Discretionary Justice in Europe and America, University of Illinois Press, 1976.

　　中国公法网·高秦伟