最后,在每一个过程中,地方性正义知识具有不可忽略的战略地位和作用。全球正义论如何包容地方正义的合理成分,地方正义论如何批评,发展全球正义是发展具有实质性意义的全球正义理论及其标准的关键之关键。特别是,那些至今还未普遍化和全球化的地方正义学说,如中国的儒学,如何能提出自己的全球正义理论,这理应是中国人对全球正义的一种贡献。
注释:
1 本文在我的英文文章的基础上做了大幅度的修正。See Baogang He,“The Four Notions of International Justice”, The Banaras Law Journal (India), Vol. 29, Nos.1-2, 2000, pp. 34-50.
2 Peter Rinderle, “The Idea of a Well-ordered Community of States,” Politicsche Vierteljahresschrift, 35(4)。 Dec. 1994: 658-698.
3 Thoms W. Pgge, “ Liberalism and International Justice: Hoffmann and National Morality in International Affairs, ” Philosophy Public Affairs, Winter, 1986, 15(1): 67-81
4 Ken Booth, “ Human Wrongs and International Relations,” International Affairs, Vol.71, No.1, 1995:103-26, p.112.
5 Alexander Shtromas, “ Religion and Ethnicity in World Order,” International Journal of World Peace, 9(2), June 1992:33-45.
6 Goodin, Robert E. The Politics of Rational Man. London: John Wiley Sons, 1976, Chapter 6.
7 参见Terry Nardon, Law, Morality and the Relations of State, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.
8 Ken Booth, “ Human Wrongs and International Relations,” International Affairs, Vol. 71, No.1, 1995, p.110.
9 Richard Falk, “ The World Order of Inter-State Law and the Law of Humanity: The Role of Civil Society Institutions”, In Daniele Archibugi and David Held, eds., Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order, Oxford: Polity Press, 1995, p.164.
10 John Rawls, “ The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus”, New York University Law review, 64(2): 233-55; p.252, footnote 46. 同时请见他的《The Law of Peoples》。也可参见,Roger Panden, “ Reconstruction Rawls‘ Law of Peoples”, Ethics and International affairs, 11, 1997: 215-232. 如要进一步了解普遍的人权的国际正义观,可参见下面这些研究作品:Charles Beitz, Political theory and International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979; Henry Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S Foreign Policy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980, p.120.
11 John Rawls, The Law of Peoples, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 79-80.
12 Rawls, The Law of Peoples, p. 80, Note 23.
13 Alexander Shtromas, “ The future World order and the Right of Nations to self-determination and sovereignty”, international Journal on World Peace 7(1), March 1990:17-49.
14 William Schabas, “ Sentencing by International Tribunals: a Human Rights Approach”, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 7(2), Spring 1997: 461-517.
15 我怀疑其有效性,因为当美国公司撤出在印尼的投资时日本公司进入了。
- 上一篇:西法背景下中国古典法律解释的意义(上)
- 下一篇:论民主与法治社会中的德治
- · 实体倾向合理性分析
- · 公权合法性的法律基础:法律主义
- · 论市场经济与立宪主义的实现
- · 法律经济学与社会关怀
- · 论法律行为概念的缘起与法学方法
- · 经验的研究司法
- · 论法律行为概念的缘起与法学方法
- · 中国法学的迷茫
- · 新 分 权(导言)
- · “澳大利亚的兔子”——法律经济