Alan Westin, Privacy and Freedom, New York: Atheneum(1967), p31-39.

　　Thomas Krattenmaker, Testimonial Privileges in Federal Court: An Alternative to the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence, 62 Geo. L.J. 85-94 (1973).

　　参见吴巡龙：《新刑事诉讼制度与证据法则》，台湾学林出版社2003年版，第247-248页。

　　Eric Green & Charles Nesson, Problems, Cases, and Materials on Evidence, 2nd ed., 1994, p.695-696.

　　John William Gergacz, Attorney-Corporate Client Privilege, Garland Law Publishing Inc., 1987, 1-4.

　　Sacramento Newspaper Guild v. Sacramento County Bd. of Suprs. (1968) 263 Cal.App.2d 41, 53.

　　See Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Attorney-Client Privilege in The Corporate Setting, p 5.

　　陈朴生：《刑事证据法》，三民书局1979年第3版，第388页。

　　沈达明编著：《英美证据法》，中信出版社1996年版，第83页。

　　Trammel v. United States, 445 U. S. 40, 51 (1980).

　　8 Wigmore,Evidence§2285 at 527-28 (McNaughten rev. 1961).

　　Mccormick, Evidence§105 at 226 (Cleary ed.1972).

　　参见波斯纳：《证据法的经济分析》，徐昕译，中国法制出版社2001年版，第145页。

　　See Shuman, The Origins of the Physician-Patient privilege and Professonal Secrect, 39 Sw. L.J.661 (1985).

　　John. W. Strong ed., McCormick On Evidence, West Group 1999, p124.

　　受雇于法庭作证的专家不在特免权之列。而专家的酬金由律师支付还是当事人支付并不重要。

　　General Accident Assurance Company v. Chrusz

　　Suburban Sew ‘n Sweep v. Swiss-Bernia, 91 F.R.D. 254 (N.D.III. 1981).

　　United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918(2d Cir.1961).

　　Section 10 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

　　In Re Grand Jury Investigation 83-2-35 (Durant), 723 F.2d 447 (6th Cir.1983).

　　In re Kaplan, 8 N.Y. 2d., 214, 203, N, Y. S. 2d 836, 168 N. E.2d 660 (1960).

　　Arthur Best：《证据法入门》，蔡秋明、蔡兆诚、郭乃嘉译，元照出版公司2002年版，第206-263页。